16. Bidjerano, T. (2005). Gender Differences in Self-Regulated Learning. Eric Online Submission. Retrived March 24, 2018, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED490777.pdf
17. Brown, A. L. (1977). Knowing When, Where and How to Remember: A Problem of metacognition, In Glaser R. (Ed.). Advances in Instructional Psychology (Vol.1, pp.77-165). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Chatterjee, A., Widick, P., sternschein, R., Smith II, W. B., & Bromberger, B. (2010). The Assessment of Art Attributes. Empirical studies of the Arts, 28, 207-222.
19. Ciascai, L., & Lavinia, H. (2011). Gender differences in metacognitive skills. A study of the 8th grade of Art Attributes. Empirical studies of the Arts, 28, 207-222.
20. Crespin, L., & Hartung, E. (1997). Metacognition as a Necessary strategy for Teacher Training in DBAE: Facilitating Theory into Practice. Visual Arts Research, 23(2), 124-34.
21. Cross, N. (2011). Design thinking: Understanding how designers think and work. Berlin: Berg.
22. Dennis, F. (1995). Aesthetic perception; metacognition; and transfer: Thinking in the visual arts. Los Angeles: University of California.
23. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. In Resnick L. (Ed.). The Nature of Intelligence (PP.231-236). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24. Goldberg, P. D. (2005). Metacognition and Art Production as Problem Solving: A study of Third Grade students. Visual arts research: educational, historical, philosophical, and psychological perspectives, 61, 67-75.
25. Hargrove, R. A., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2015). The impact of metacognitive instruction on creative problem solving. The
Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 291-318.
26. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational technology research and development, 48(4), 63-85.
27. Jones, J. C. (1992). Design methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Justice, E. M., & Dornan, T. M. (2001). Metacognitive differences between traditional-age and nontraditional-age college students. Adult education quarterly, 51(3), 236-249.
29. Kincannon, J., Gleber, C., & Kim, J. (1999). The Effects of Metacognitive Training on Performance and Use of Metacognitive Skills in Self-Directed Learning Situations. In Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Papers Presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology 21, February 10-14 (pp.171-184). Washington U.S. Department of Education.
30. Kurt, M., & Kurt, S. (2017). Improving design understandings and skills through enhanced metacognition: Reflective design journals. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 36(2), 226-238.
31. Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: the design process demystified. London: Routledge.
32. Lyon, P. (2016). Design education: learning, teaching and researching through design. London: Routledge.
33. Meichanbaum, D., Burland, S., Gruson, L., & Cameron, R. (1985). Metacognitive Assessment. Dalam S. Yussen (Ed.). The Growth of Reflection in Children (pp. 1-30). New York Academic Press.
34. Oda, C. W. (2015). The impact of dual-processing metacognitive scaffolding on architectural student writing, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Capella University, Minneapolis.
35. Papaleontiou, E. L. (2008). Metacognition and theory of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
36. Roussis, P., Wells, A. (2006). Post-traumatic stress symptoms: Tests of relationships with thought control strategies and beliefs as predicted by the metacognitive model. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(1), 111-122.
37. Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431-449.
38. Silvia, P. J. (2007). Knowledge-based assessment of expertise in the arts: Exploring aesthetic fluency. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(4), 247.
39. Smalser, A. G. (1991). Metacognition and the art-making process of visual artists, Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, UMI, Miami.
40. Smith, L. F., Smith, J. K. (2006).The Nature and Growth of Aesthetic Fluency. In P. Locher (Ed), New directions in aesthetics, creativity, and the psychology of art (pp. 47–58). New York: Baywood Publishing.
41. Virtanen, P. & Nevgi, A. (2010). Disciplinary and gender differences among higher education students in self-regulated learning strategies. Educational Psychology, 30 (3), 323–347.
42. Van Etten, S., Pressley, M., McInerney, D. M., & Liem,
A.D. (2008). College seniors' theory of their academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 812.
43. Veenman, M. V., Hesselink, R. D., Sleeuwaegen, S., Liem, S. I., & Van Haaren, M. G. (2014). Assessing Developmental Differences in Metacognitive Skills with Computer Log files: Gender by Age Interactions. Psihologijske teme, 23(1), 99-113.
44. Wells, A. (2002). Emotional disorders and metacognition: Innovative cognitive therapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
45. Wells, A., & Cartwright _Hatton, K. (2004). A short form of the metacognitive Questionnaire: properties of MCQ-30. Behavior research and therapy, 92, 385-396.
46. Zande, R. V. (2016). Design education: Creating thinkers to improve the world. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
47. Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 10-45). Routledge.